Like/Tweet/+1
Latest topics
» Now listening to . . .
by Neon Knight Today at 0:56

» Animals - News & General
by Sary Yesterday at 10:55

» Front National / Rassemblement National
by Neon Knight Wed 14 Nov - 18:16

» Hitler's friendship with a part Jewish child
by Neon Knight Wed 14 Nov - 1:21

» Italian 'land-for-children' idea to increase birth rate
by Sary Mon 5 Nov - 22:41

» 12 Common French Gestures
by Sary Mon 5 Nov - 22:21

» White majorities feel threatened [good article]
by Neon Knight Mon 5 Nov - 20:40

» Germany's AfD Party
by Neon Knight Sun 4 Nov - 22:00

» There's only 11 mins of play in an American football game
by Jehan I Sat 3 Nov - 13:06

» Song Cover-Versions & Originals
by Neon Knight Sat 3 Nov - 1:38

» English Teen Kidnapped for 12 years
by Jehan I Fri 2 Nov - 18:56

» Old Film Trailers (to 2009)
by Neon Knight Wed 31 Oct - 22:09

» Classic TV Adverts
by Neon Knight Wed 31 Oct - 21:26

» European Royalty
by Neon Knight Wed 31 Oct - 21:12

» Halloween Customs of Scotland
by Neon Knight Wed 31 Oct - 20:50

» British New Zealander politician cannot understand Scottish accent
by OsricPearl Mon 29 Oct - 13:32

» Personality traits linked to political orientation
by Neon Knight Tue 23 Oct - 14:00

» Favourite Film Scenes
by Neon Knight Fri 19 Oct - 19:13

» Opinion survey on gene editing
by Sary Fri 19 Oct - 2:00

» More Madness from America - The Fake Indian
by OsricPearl Thu 18 Oct - 3:28

» Students to lecture profs. on diversity
by Neon Knight Tue 16 Oct - 21:45

» A flag to represent European people?
by Sary Sun 14 Oct - 1:30

» How do you write these numbers in words?
by OsricPearl Sat 13 Oct - 22:41

» UK Migration Issues
by Neon Knight Sat 13 Oct - 22:09

» Radio hostess banned for 'safe space' joke
by Neon Knight Wed 10 Oct - 23:56

» Beautiful Feminine Art
by OsricPearl Wed 10 Oct - 2:50

» Supreme Court Clown Car of Witches
by Neon Knight Mon 8 Oct - 20:26

» Defence Spending - NATO and Others
by Neon Knight Sun 7 Oct - 21:17

» Jirel of Joiry - the first female fantasy warrior
by OsricPearl Fri 5 Oct - 18:10

» Accounts of Apparitions
by Neon Knight Fri 5 Oct - 1:08

» London Street Scenes 1967
by Neon Knight Sun 30 Sep - 23:20

» American/British/German Attitudes to Military Heroism
by Sary Sun 30 Sep - 22:30

» Africa’s dangerous baby boom
by Neon Knight Sat 29 Sep - 18:03

» Waterfalls of Iceland
by Neon Knight Thu 27 Sep - 21:16

» What it takes to be superhuman
by Sary Sat 22 Sep - 1:22

» France nearly restored its monarchy in 1871
by Iseult Mon 17 Sep - 7:23

» Sweden votes tomorrow
by OsricPearl Sun 16 Sep - 15:39

» Rise of Nationalist Parties in Europe
by OsricPearl Sat 15 Sep - 18:30

» The Society for Creative Anachronism and a Swastika Controversy
by Neon Knight Fri 14 Sep - 22:35

» Project to put Sadiq Khan balloon over London
by Neon Knight Mon 3 Sep - 17:22


Racially aggravated crime - does it make sense?

Reply to topic

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Racially aggravated crime - does it make sense?

Post Neon Knight on Sun 15 Oct - 1:57

Imagine the following scenario:


Two half drunk white men cross the street and begin an unprovoked attack on a black man. White Man A shouts several racial insults during the attack. White Man B, though just as physically aggressive, says nothing.

The crime is reported, the two white men are tried and found guilty of Actual Bodily Harm. Both are sent to prison but Man A is also found guilty of a racially aggravated offence:

"The offender demonstrating towards the victim of the offence hostility based on the victim's membership (or presumed membership) of a racial or religious group"

And so he is given a longer prison sentence than Man A . . .

"In addition to the specific offences created by the Act, the law imposes a general duty on criminal courts, when sentencing an offender, to treat more seriously any offence which can be shown to be racially or religiously aggravated (Section 145 Criminal Justice Act 2003)"


Is the longer sentence for Man A logical or should his racial insults at the victim have made no difference to the seriousness of his crime?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Between the velvet lies, there's a truth that's hard as steel
The vision never dies, life's a never ending wheel
- R.J.Dio
avatar
Neon Knight
The Castellan

Male Posts : 1172
Join date : 2017-03-05

http://castle-europa.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

.

Post Guest on Sun 15 Oct - 22:00

@Neon Knight wrote:Imagine the following scenario:


Two half drunk white men cross the street and begin an unprovoked attack on a black man. White Man A shouts several racial insults during the attack. White Man B, though just as physically aggressive, says nothing.

The crime is reported, the two white men are tried and found guilty of Actual Bodily Harm. Both are sent to prison but Man A is also found guilty of a racially aggravated offence:

"The offender demonstrating towards the victim of the offence hostility based on the victim's membership (or presumed membership) of a racial or religious group"

And so he is given a longer prison sentence than Man A . . .

"In addition to the specific offences created by the Act, the law imposes a general duty on criminal courts, when sentencing an offender, to treat more seriously any offence which can be shown to be racially or religiously aggravated (Section 145 Criminal Justice Act 2003)"


Is the longer sentence for Man A logical or should his racial insults at the victim have made no difference to the seriousness of his crime?

Strange decision. White Man A offended the black guy's dignity, too, that's why it sounds logical.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum